The so far ‘lost fight’ against money laundering in Kosovo

January 21, 2020

Visual Hunt

Espresso.Insights

Authors

Rreze Hoxha Zhuja
rule of law

Fight against money laundering and the confiscation of illegally obtained assets in Kosovo, is so far to be considered a lost fight for Kosovo. An indication of stagnation in this respect is the extremely large disproportion between the sequestrated and confiscated assets that have been obtained illegally. According to published reports, the total value of the confiscated property is about 3.8 million Euros, while the value of the sequestrated wealth in Kosovo is over 150 million Euros.

Candidly, money laundering implies putting or transferring money and property acquired through criminal activity into lawful financial flows, so in the future, to create their fictitious legalization. The existing legal regulation in Kosovo is considered to be sufficient to secure the basis for confiscation of illegally acquired assets, but unfortunately the same regulation in practice does not have a satisfactory implementation. This is considered to be caused by the SPRK’s negligence on prosecuting money laundering cases and seizing illegally obtained assets and their reliance only on Kosovo’s Police criminal reports in order to initiate a criminal investigation, the lack of identification of the property or assets acquired illegally and the lack of requests for those assets to be permanently confiscated by the court together with the lack of profiling of SPRK prosecutors in investigating such cases.

Moreover, the lack of proper legal interpretation of the Law No. 05/L-096 on Prevention of Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism, which offers two opportunities to prosecute this criminal offense (one by filing an indictment involving a predicate offense of money laundering; second, by filing an indictment for the offense of money laundering as a basic offense, without the need of any prior offense), not only by prosecutors but judges as well, have directly affected the number and the quality of the indictments and final court decisions on money laundering cases and confiscation of illegally obtained assets in the country. On the other hand, the low level of confiscation of illegally obtained assets by a final court decision that prevails in Kosovo and the lack of profiling judges in trying money laundering as a standalone offense and its judicial treatment as such, are to be recognized as the main issues identified in the judicial system.

However, from 2018 onwards progress has been made on fully using the legal basis permitting the filing of “Money Laundering” indictments as a single standalone offense, regardless of whether it is related to any other criminal offense and the possibility that the “Money Laundering” offense is the result of another criminal offense. So far, there are 4 indictments filed which have treated this criminal offense as a separated one. Moreover, in 2019, the Basic Court of Prishtina rendered a conviction judgment and confiscated the value of nine hundred sixty-four thousand eight hundred and twenty and forty-eight cents (946.820.84). But, it is still not a permanent confiscation because the case is in the Appellate Court. These two undertakings represent a strong and clear indication that Kosovo’s prosecutorial and judicial system have amplified their efforts on fighting this phenomenon in the country. More specifically, they show that there are prosecutors and judges willing to serve and implement the law properly.

Nevertheless, even though these are to be considered turning points, these two endeavors are not enough to recuperate from ‘the ongoing defeat’ of Kosovo on the fight against money laundering and the confiscation of illegally obtained assets. The SPRK should actively prosecute this offense and should the reports of all state agencies which may report cases with circumstances implicating money laundering. Moreover, the SPRK should sequestrate all assets suspected of being subject of money laundering from the moment that the investigation for the offense of money laundering commences and likewise, in every indictment should make a proposal for confiscation, as this facilitates the court to confiscate illegal property at the conclusion of criminal proceedings. And more importantly, together with the judges of the new established Special Department in Prishtina, should further increase the full use of the legal basis permitting the filing of “Money Laundering” indictments as a single standalone offense.


Espresso.Insights

The so far ‘lost fight’ against money laundering in Kosovo

Download PDF 21/01/2020

Share article


Related Espresso Insights

October 28, 2024

Espresso.Insights

From D.C. to the Balkans: Why America’s Choice Matters More than Ever?

by GLPS

July 20, 2024

Espresso.Insights

What Can We Expect from von der Leyen’s Second Mandate?

by GLPS

Latest Publications